🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.